Saturday, December 3, 2011
Saturday, November 26, 2011
Definition of Love

Tuesday, June 14, 2011
“Should I—or should I not—forgive?”
As told by Lillianna Angel Cummings
I have a story to tell you today. About what? Well, about love, and especially about forgiveness.
It began in 1970 when Sarah Perkins found a job as a secretary for an insurance company.
She had not worked there long before she realized she was falling in love. He was a traveling salesman for the same company; a shy, loner-type fellow named Brett Angel who never looked a person in the eye without turning a shade darker.
Love works wonders, as you all know. After a long (and rather awkward) courtship (for it took Brett a long time to finally be able to express his feelings for her), they were engaged, and then married.
Living together made many changes in their lives; they learned to depend and to be dependable; they learned how to take life as a wonderful challenge, and most of all, they learned to accommodate each other’s many faults and yet grow ever steadier in their love.
Sarah’s main challenge was to help her husband overcome his shyness. Twice he was nearly fired from the company because his introversion cost him many would-be customers. Sarah knew that her husband was very discouraged over his disability; thus she vowed to herself to help her husband see his own worth and bring up his self-esteem. However, even his weakness brought a measure of security for her, because she knew that he was especially shy around women.
One day, Brett was sent by his employers to another town to check out some prospective customers. Once again, however, his shyness intruded, and the expected order failed to come to pass. Over the phone in his dingy downtown hotel room, he received a mighty tirade from his boss, who ended it by warning Brett “never to set foot in the company again”. Brett was fired!
Back home, a friend of Sarah’s overheard the tirade and called her immediately, telling her what had happened. Shocked, Sarah made arrangements to go to that town and meet up with Brett, so that he wouldn’t have to be alone with this terrible disappointment.
Arriving in the next city a few hours later, as she made her way toward the hotel where Brett normally stayed, she beheld a horrid sight! There was Brett in the doorway of a tavern, drunk and garrulous, with his arm around a beautiful, scantily clad woman. Sarah watched in horror as Brett leaned over suddenly and passionately kissed the girl. The girl’s profession was obvious, but… Brett! Hot tears stung Sarah’s eyes and coursed down her cheek. Turning abruptly, without Brett even having noticed her presence across the street, she walked briskly back to the bus stop, boarding the next bus home.
The first thing she did back home was change the message on the phone’s answering machine. It said, “Brett, I saw you in that town. Can you come home soon, please? Sarah.”
One can imagine the horror and shock she felt. One would almost think she would hate Brett. Did she? How could she love such a man who could completely forget her and betray her in this way?! Only one thought remained in her mind: Should I—or should I not —forgive?
Brett arrived home the next night, just as expected. One look at his wife’s face told him immediately that she knew exactly what he had done. For a long moment, he stood at the doorway still holding his bags, their eyes locked. Aside their heaving chests neither moved at all; neither said a word.
Finally, Brett lowered his eyes. His eyes filled with remorseful tears. But before he could begin to stammer an apology, his wife’s arms opened into a welcoming embrace. Dropping his bags, he ran to her open arms. She buried her head in his shoulder, baptizing it with a steady unchecked flow of tears. Leaning closer, she managed, through her tears, to whisper in his ear,
“Honey, I’m so proud of you. You’ve overcome your shyness! Now you can get a better job and start over.”
By this, Sarah meant that she had forgiven and forgotten his wrongdoings.
As a result of this loving, forgiving act, Brett changed entirely. His inferiority complex vanished and he found an excellent job as a journalist. He and Sarah went on to raise 3 children to full maturity, before a car crash claimed both their lives in an instant.
One thing I know for certain: Brett Angel never betrayed Sarah’s trust again. I know because… he was my father, and Sarah, my mother.
She told me this story on my wedding day.
My mother taught me the most valuable counsel I have ever heard, and that is to forgive, for to love is to forgive, and to forgive is to love.
Sunday, June 5, 2011
To Know, vs. Knowledge of
The result of a little reflection spree the other day.
By Yours Truly
Sometimes when speaking in English about Jesus with a new acquaintance, I come upon a problem. If I ask, “Do you know Jesus?” usually the person will immediately reply, “Of course I do,” with a furrow on their brow, as if to say, “Who doesn’t?”
Not good enough. I shake my head and try another tack. Because they obviously don’t know Him—not the way I mean. They’re thinking something to this effect, Of course I know of Jesus. I hear about Him all the time. Who hasn’t? Oh dear, I hope this isn’t another religious fanatic...
This problem stems from the fact that our little English word “know” has a strangely wideh variety of meanings. I had never really noticed that fact, until I took up the study of Latin-based languages in earnest. It hit me, one day, as I was reflecting upon certain Spanish words and their meanings, that there are at least two distinct fields of thought condensed into our little English word “know”. And when a single word is the only vent for several different refrains of thoughts, misunderstandings are bound to arise.
Latin-based languages do not have this particular problem. Neither did our Old-English speaking ancestors; in fact, as far as I've been able to ascertain, most languages have enough verbs to cover the different domains which are governed solely by our “know”.
For reasons of time and convenience, I confined my research to Latin and its derivative languages, and came in the end to two root-words, upon which I've based this essay.
The first is the Latin word ‘sapere.’ Sapere has to do with information—that is, the educational, facts-and-figures type of knowledge. It's original meaning being 'to taste, or smell, to be informed of, to have heard of, or read about, or deduced, or learned.' To know of something. This word, and its intimated meaning, seems to denote a rather more superficial sort of knowledge.
“I know the sum of 2 + 2.”
“He knows that elephants are big.”
The other refrain of thought, for which we also use the word “know”, is derived from “cognocere,” or “gnoscere,” which denotes a more intimate feeling. It means to be acquainted with, to have met someone or something, and known them personally or figuratively. To have experienced something.
The connotation attached to this version of “know” is an intimate connection with the subject in question. We are not only aware of its existence; we have been touched in some way by its existence. This kind of knowledge is not always quantifiable, nor verifiable; it cannot always be measured via the facts-and-figures approach to knowledge. It goes beyond head-knowledge.
Therefore, when I’m speaking in, say, Spanish with someone and I venture to introduce my best Friend to them in the course of our conversation, I will naturally use the word for “know” derived from “cognocere,” and it produces an entirely different effect. More often than not, the person I’m speaking with will screw up their face and say, “What do you mean?” And they’re thinking, Of course I’ve never met Jesus; how could I have? I’ve heard of Him, sure, but I don’t know him... oh dear, not another religious fanatic.
Therein lies my point. It's the battle of 'knowledge of ' versus 'to know'.
Once that point is clear between myself and whoever it is I'm speaking with, I can then go on and introduce Jesus personally, because He really is a friend of mine, and I have met Him personally—it’s a heart thing, not an explainable derivative of sapere.
A short example will perhaps explain my point better and in fewer words.
Take an electrician, who knows everything he needs to know about electricity. He has a profound and all-encompassing knowledge of electricity; he knows how it works, why it works, what it does, and how to best use it. You could factually say he knows electricity, and you would be borrowing the term derived from 'sapere.'
Now, on the other hand, take a hill-billy country bumpkin who can't hardly spell his own name, has never seen an electrical appliance, and who has none of the technical information or knowledge about electricity. However, he was once struck by a lightning. His own acquaintanceship with electricity is vitally deeper than that of the electrician's, even though he never took a course on the subject, because he has actually experienced the power of the current in his own body. Thus, when he says, “Trust me, I KNOW electricity,” he's speaking the truth, cognoscere-wise.
I kind of feel the same way about Jesus. I don't have much technical knowledge of him, and apart from the very brief thumbnail sketch we are given of Him in the Bible, there isn't much anyone alive today can know of his physical persona.
However, I KNOW Him, I've experienced him, and so I’m eager that everyone I meet should meet Jesus, too, because, well, He is the center feature of my entire life, the reason for my existence. Without Him, I would have given up a long time ago. I still don't know what he looks like, but I know the touch of his spirit. It's not something I can describe; each person's got to experience it for themselves.
So what does it mean to know Jesus? Most people know of Him, but how many actually know him in the cognoscere sense of the word? How many have met Him, touched His presence in their heart? Head-knowledge of Him won’t warm your soul when you’re lonely, won’t protect you when you’re in trouble, won’t feed and strengthen your spirit. People who lump Jesus into the pot with all the other great men of history simply don’t know Him, period.
Jesus was not, and is not, a religious tidbit—he was a person. God wanted to show us an understandable illustration of Himself—He knew we as humans simply cannot grasp the concept of “God”; we’ve only the vaguest of ideas of the principles that govern the God factor of the universe. And so He dressed Jesus up in human flesh and said, “Here, this is Me.” Jesus was a human God; the Bible said He became flesh and dwelt among us, so we could behold the glory of the Father. (Another radical concept: God’s love for us is akin to the love a parent feels for his darling child. Earth-shaking concept at the time, when God was essentially a Law-Maker.)
Jesus broke absolutely every precedent in His interactions with humanity, and in the truths He taught. He was the first person to go around advocating unconditional forgiveness of enemies; He taught principles of life based on pure love, which was unheard of. Life’s principles were generally based on justice (well, sort of...), certainly not love. Jesus implied that sin not only meant breaking the rules; it also meant keeping the rules for unloving purposes. The only ones who could hope to attain to God’s mercy were those who accepted His love—and that God’s reward system is based on how faithful we are to His loving principles, rather than on how strictly we keep all the rules.
Those who actually met Jesus face to face while He was alive were deeply influenced and changed by His presence. Then Jesus was killed. He came back to life, hung around for forty days, and then His physical body took the elevator through the clouds. Since then, relatively few people have had the opportunity to meet Jesus face to face while still living on this planet.
But there’s still a very real Jesus, who, though no longer on our physical plane as a fellow human endowed with flesh and blood, nevertheless longs to meet each individual alive, and thrill each heart with His personal acquaintanceship, and His amazing and exclusive love.
Luckily, He’s got agents who make it their personal business to introduce Him to others.
Whether you “know” Jesus the way you know facts or figures, or whether you have met Him personally and know Him as He is meant to be known, in that deep, intimate way, makes all the difference in the world.
And it’s really too bad that we English speakers have to use the same word for both occasions.
“And you shall KNOW the truth, and the truth will make you free!!!”
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Give What You Have

Friday, April 29, 2011
Why the Train Stalled in Peterborough...
A real Good Samaritan

In today's Magazine
- The politics of bank holidays
- 7 days 7 questions
- The art of explaining stuff
- How to succeed in business by doing nothingOne act of kindness that befell British writer Bernard Hare in 1982 changed him profoundly. Then a student living just north of London, he tells the story to inspire troubled young people to help deal with their disrupted lives.
The police called at my student hovel early evening, but I didn't answer as I thought they'd come to evict me. I hadn't paid my rent in months.
But then I got to thinking: my mum hadn't been too good and what if it was something about her?
We had no phone in the hovel and mobiles hadn't been invented yet, so I had to nip down the phone box.
I rang home to Leeds to find my mother was in hospital and not expected to survive the night. "Get home, son," my dad said.
I got to the railway station to find I'd missed the last train. A train was going as far as Peterborough, but I would miss the connecting Leeds train by twenty minutes.
“Start Quote

To this day, I won't hear a bad word said about British Rail”
I bought a ticket home and got on anyway. I was a struggling student and didn't have the money for a taxi the whole way, but I had a screwdriver in my pocket and my bunch of skeleton keys.
I was so desperate to get home that I planned to nick a car in Peterborough, hitch hike, steal some money, something, anything. I just knew from my dad's tone of voice that my mother was going to die that night and I intended to get home if it killed me.
"Tickets, please," I heard, as I stared blankly out of the window at the passing darkness. I fumbled for my ticket and gave it to the guard when he approached. He stamped it, but then just stood there looking at me. I'd been crying, had red eyes and must have looked a fright.
"You okay?" he asked.
"Course I'm okay," I said. "Why wouldn't I be? And what's it got to do with you in any case?"
"You look awful," he said. "Is there anything I can do?"
"You could get lost and mind your own business," I said. "That'd be a big help." I wasn't in the mood for talking.
He was only a little bloke and he must have read the danger signals in my body language and tone of voice, but he sat down opposite me anyway and continued to engage me.
"If there's a problem, I'm here to help. That's what I'm paid for."
I was a big bloke in my prime, so I thought for a second about physically sending him on his way, but somehow it didn't seem appropriate. He wasn't really doing much wrong. I was going through all the stages of grief at once: denial, anger, guilt, withdrawal, everything but acceptance. I was a bubbling cauldron of emotion and he had placed himself in my line of fire.
The only other thing I could think of to get rid of him was to tell him my story.
"Look, my mum's in hospital, dying, she won't survive the night, I'm going to miss the connection to Leeds at Peterborough, I'm not sure how I'm going to get home.
"It's tonight or never, I won't get another chance, I'm a bit upset, I don't really feel like talking, I'd be grateful if you'd leave me alone. Okay?"
"Okay," he said, finally getting up. "Sorry to hear that, son. I'll leave you alone then. Hope you make it home in time." Then he wandered off down the carriage back the way he came.
I continued to look out of the window at the dark. Ten minutes later, he was back at the side of my table. Oh no, I thought, here we go again. This time I really am going to rag him down the train.
He touched my arm. "Listen, when we get to Peterborough, shoot straight over to Platform One as quick as you like. The Leeds train'll be there."
I looked at him dumbfounded. It wasn't really registering. "Come again," I said, stupidly. "What do you mean? Is it late, or something?"
"No, it isn't late," he said, defensively, as if he really cared whether trains were late or not. "No, I've just radioed Peterborough. They're going to hold the train up for you. As soon as you get on, it goes.
"Everyone will be complaining about how late it is, but let's not worry about that on this occasion. You'll get home and that's the main thing. Good luck and God bless."
Then he was off down the train again. "Tickets, please. Any more tickets now?"
I suddenly realised what a top-class, fully-fledged doilem I was and chased him down the train. I wanted to give him all the money from my wallet, my driver's licence, my keys, but I knew he would be offended.
I caught him up and grabbed his arm. "Oh, er, I just wanted to…" I was suddenly speechless. "I, erm…"
"I wish I had some way to thank you," I said. "I appreciate what you've done.""It's okay," he said. "Not a problem." He had a warm smile on his face and true compassion in his eyes. He was a good man for its own sake and required nothing in return.
"Not a problem," he said again. "If you feel the need to thank me, the next time you see someone in trouble, you help them out. That will pay me back amply.
"Tell them to pay you back the same way and soon the world will be a better place."
I was at my mother's side when she died in the early hours of the morning. Even now, I can't think of her without remembering the Good Conductor on that late-night train to Peterborough and, to this day, I won't hear a bad word said about British Rail.
My meeting with the Good Conductor changed me from a selfish, potentially violent hedonist into a decent human being, but it took time.
"I've paid him back a thousand times since then," I tell the young people I work with, "and I'll keep on doing so till the day I die. You don't owe me nothing. Nothing at all."
"And if you think you do, I'd give you the same advice the Good Conductor gave me. Pass it down the line.
Friday, April 15, 2011
Master Oogway's Words of Wisdom
Friday, April 1, 2011
Atheist Holiday
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
No Ski Like Snow Ski
Here is an article by one of my favourite humourist writers, Bruce Cameron, from the Creators Syndicate. As skiing is NOT one of my favoured sports, despite having lived among the slopes of some awesome Swiss mountains, this article particularly struck my fancy. Hope you'll enjoy it too!Thursday, March 17, 2011
Read this and WEEEEEP!!!
By Matt Blake, Daily Mail, 15th March 2011
When author Sheridan Simove sat down to write his new book, What Every Man Thinks About Apart From Sex, he drew a blank … literally.
So he had it published anyway with a front cover and 200 completely empty pages.
But it’s proved a hit and has outsold both Harry Potter and the Da Vinci Code within weeks of its release on cyber bookshop Amazon.com.
The £4.69 masterpiece has transcended its original purpose as a novelty gift, and is being used by students as a lecture notebook. And it’s selling by the thousands.
Nottingham university student Jess Lloyd told the Telegraph: ‘I bought a copy for my mate as a joke and he started using it as a note pad for lectures. Now everyone seems to have one. It’s started a real craze on campus.’
Mr Simove, 39, an Oxford University graduate, author, performer and entrepreneur, said: ‘I never anticipated that my book would be used for students to take their lecture notes in.
‘In a sense they are proving me wrong by filling my book with content. But I wonder how many of them go back to thinking about sex once the lecture is over.’
The item has sold out its first print run, slotting in at number 744 on Amazon’s list, ahead of Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code (2,910) and JK Rowling’s Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2,406).
What Every Man Thinks About Apart From Sex, rather unsurprisingly, took just nine days to complete, from conception to publication.
Mr Simove says his follow up is going to be called Reasons to Trust Politicians.
Friday, March 11, 2011
Truth Is Stranger And More Exciting Than Fiction

By Zig Ziglar, March 4, 2011
“Gone With The Wind” is the classic. “Scarlett” is the follow-up to the classic. However, the original story had more than just a kernel of truth in it. There was a Rhett Butler, but his real name was Rhett Turnipseed. Scarlett O’Hara was Emelyn Louise Hannon. Yes, Rhett did walk out on her and join the Confederate Army. When the war was over, Rhett Turnipseed became a drifter and gambler. He ended up in Nashville where his life was turned around on Easter morning in 1871 when he attended a Methodist revival meeting and converted to the Christian faith. Soon after, he enrolled at Vanderbilt University and became a Methodist preacher. Reverend Rhett was worried about a young woman in his flock who had run away and was working in a house of prostitution in St. Louis. Rhett rode off to look for her and found her. Incredibly enough, the madam was his former love, Emelyn Louise Hannon—or Scarlett. She refused to let Rhett see the young woman, so Rhett challenged her to a game of cards. If he won, the young girl would be free; if Scarlett won, she would remain. Rhett won.
Fortunately, the story ends well for everyone. The young girl married well and became the matriarch of a leading family in the state. Later, Emelyn, so impressed with the change in Rhett’s life, also converted and joined the Methodist church, and eventually opened an orphanage for Cherokee children. She died in 1903. Her grave is marked to this day.
The message is two-fold. First, truth really is stranger than fiction and, second, yes, people can change. From gambler to preacher and from madam to operator of an orphanage for displaced children represent quite a change. So don’t give up. You can change.
Friday, January 28, 2011
Fevers N' Baby...
Alas, my little baby woosel has a fever. I didn't take it too seriously yesterday; but when the fever did not break all night, and fluctuated in regular fever-fashion between 38.5 and 39.5 all day today, with no other apparent physical symptoms, I am inclined to consider taking her to the local clinic tomorrow (horrors, shivers-down-my-spine). I am a firm believer in allowing the body to heal itself according to God's well-planned design, and follow its natural cycles and courses as much as possible, without jumping into the medicine cabinet or running to the medicine man every time someone says 'ouch'... but there are times when consulting a doctor is the wisest course of action, particularly when the symptoms are strange or variable. Whether or not to submit to chemical treatment is, in my firm opinion, a strictly personal choice, especially in little matters like common colds, fevers, and ordinary ailments--which tend to follow a natural course on their own, with or without chemical remedies. But I have also learned to be thankful for doctors and medication, in those rare occasions when something turns out to be serious enough to require a professional's advice, assistance and care. My family and friends know that I am a bit on the leery side of the medical profession and pharmaceutical companies in general, nevertheless I hope I have acquired sufficient humility to admit that I do not know very much, and so am grateful for the wise counsels of competent doctors. Sunday, November 21, 2010
Library: Mere Christianity
Yesterday, I opened my email account, and there was a letter from my mom. "Cherie," it said, "As a BIG favor, would you be able to find the book 'Mere Christianity' by C.S. Lewis, and send it to me in a file rather than by mediafire?"Wednesday, November 3, 2010
Let Us Be Kind
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
The Paradoxical Commandments

Friday, October 22, 2010
News From Madagascar
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Prebirthday Meditations
Monday, October 11, 2010
The Owl Critic
One of my favorite poems, with a purty darn good lesson...- "WHO stuffed that white owl?" No one spoke in the shop:
- The barber was busy, and he couldn't stop;
- The customers, waiting their turns, were all reading
- The "Daily," the "Herald," the "Post," little heeding
- The young man who blurted out such a blunt question;
- Not one raised a head, or even made a suggestion;
- And the barber kept on shaving.
- "Don't you see, Mister Brown,"
- Cried the youth, with a frown,
- "How wrong the whole thing is,
- How preposterous each wing is,
- How flattened the head is, how jammed down the neck is--
- In short, the whole owl, what an ignorant wreck 't is!
- I make no apology;
- I've learned owl-eology.
- I've passed days and nights in a hundred collections,
- And cannot be blinded to any defections
- Arising from unskilful fingers that fail
- To stuff a bird right, from his beak to his tail.
- Mister Brown! Mister Brown!
- Do take that bird down,
- Or you'll soon be the laughing-stock all over town!"
- And the barber kept on shaving.
- "I've studied owls,
- And other night fowls,
- And I tell you
- What I know to be true:
- An owl cannot roost
- With his limbs so unloosed;
- No owl in this world
- Ever had his claws curled,
- Ever had his legs slanted,
- Ever had his bill canted,
- Ever had his neck screwed
- Into that attitude.
- He can't do it, because
- 'T is against all bird-laws.
- Anatomy teaches,
- Ornithology preaches
- An owl has a toe
- That can't turn out so!
- I've made the white owl my study for years,
- And to see such a job almost moves me to tears!
- Mister Brown, I'm amazed
- You should be so gone crazed
- As to put up a bird
- In that posture absurd!
- To look at that owl really brings on a dizziness;
- The man who stuffed him don't half know his business!"
- And the barber kept on shaving.
- "Examine those eyes.
- I'm filled with surprise
- Taxidermists should pass
- Off on you such poor glass;
- So unnatural they seem
- They'd make Audubon scream,
- And John Burroughs laugh
- To encounter such chaff.
- Do take that bird down;
- Have him stuffed again, Brown!"
- And the barber kept on shaving.
- "With some sawdust and bark
- I could stuff in the dark
- An owl better than that.
- I could make an old hat
- Look more like an owl
- Than that horrid fowl,
- Stuck up there so stiff like a side of coarse leather.
- In fact, about him there's not one natural feather."
- Just then, with a wink and a sly normal lurch,
- The owl, very gravely, got down from his perch,
- Walked round, and regarded his fault-finding critic
- (Who thought he was stuffed) with a glance analytic,
- And then fairly hooted, as if he should say:
- "Your learning's at fault this time, any way;
- Don't waste it again on a live bird, I pray.
- I'm an owl; you're another. Sir Critic, good-day!"
- And the barber kept on shaving.
- James T. Fields
The Owl Critic
Saturday, September 25, 2010
The Good, the Bad, and the Other Stuff

.jpg)
Behind Bars

Pope Leo XII, on a visit to the jail of the Papal States in 1825, insisted on questioning each of the prisoners as to how he had come to be there. Almost every man protested his innocence. Only one humbly admitted that he was a forger and a thief.


